e-ISSN: 2717-7149
  • Home
  • About The Journal
  • Editorial Board
  • Instructions for Authors
  • Contact
Current Issue
Ahead Of Print
Archive
Search
Most Popular
Download Articles Read Articles
Retina Arter Tıkanıklıkları ve Tedavisi...
Santral Retinal Ven Tıkanıklığı Güncel Tedavisi...
Central Retinal Artery Occlusion As the Cause of Unilateral Concentric Narrowing of Visual Field and Presence of Cilioretinal Artery...
Bilateral Optic Disc Drusen
Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor and Anti VEGF Agents...
Central Retinal Artery Occlusion As the Cause of Unilateral Concentric Narrowing of Visual Field and Presence of Cilioretinal Artery...
Retina Arter Tıkanıklıkları ve Tedavisi...
Morning Glory Syndrome Associated with Retinochoroidal Coloboma...
Santral Retinal Ven Tıkanıklığı Güncel Tedavisi...
Bilateral Optic Disc Drusen
PureSee Kesintisiz Yüksek Kalitede Görüş
Retina-Vitreous 2020 , Vol 29 , Num 3
Turkish Abstract Abstract Free Full Text English Similar Articles Mail to Author
Effectiveness of Ranibizumab and Afl ibercept in Branch Retinal Vein Occlusion
Naciye KABATAS1, Tolga BICER1, Sinan CALISKAN2, Osman CELIKAY1, Canan GURDAL3
1MD, University of Health Sciences, Diskapi Yildirim Beyazit Research and Education Hospital, Department of Ophthalmology, Ankara, Turkey
2MD, Assoc. Prof., University of Health Sciences , Diskapi Yildirim Beyazit Research and Education Hospital, Department of Ophthalmology, Ankara, Turkey
3MD, Prof, World Eye Hospital, Department of Ophthalmology, Ankara, Turkey
DOI : 10.37845/ret.vit.2020.29.41 Purpose: To assess functional and anatomic effectiveness of intravitreal ranibizumab and afl ibercept injection given to patients with macular edema secondary to branch retinal vein occlusion.

Method: We retrospectively reviewed fi les of 62 treatment-naive patients with macular edema due to branch retinal vein occlusion. The best-corrected visual acuity and optic coherence parameters were recorded on months 0, 1, 3, 6 and 12 in all patients. First 3 injections were performed in a monthly manner. Pro re nata (PRN) regimen was given during follow-up.

Findings: Baseline visual acuity was 50.7±7.6 letters in ranibizumab group and 49.2±6.7 letters in afl ibercept group (p=0.403). No signifi cant difference was detected in visual acuity on month 12 between groups (p=0.313). Again, no signifi cant difference was detected in central foveal thickness on month 12 between groups (p=0.408). Mean number of intravitreal injection was 6.2±1.4 in ranibizumab group and 5.7±1.0 in afl ibercept group (p=0.174). At the end of month 12, complete recovery in subretinal detachment was detected in 16 patients (88.8%) receiving ranibizumab and 15 patients receiving afl ibercept (93.8%) (p=0.525).

Conclusion: In our study, no signifi cant difference was detected in reduction of central foveal thickness, improvement in visual acuity and number of injections between two agents. Keywords : Afl ibercept, Macular edema, Ranibizumab, Branch retinal vein occlusion

PureSee Kesintisiz Yüksek Kalitede Görüş
Home
About The Journal
Editorial Board
Instructions for Authors
Contact