e-ISSN: 2717-7149
  • Home
  • About The Journal
  • Editorial Board
  • Instructions for Authors
  • Contact
Current Issue
Ahead Of Print
Archive
Search
Most Popular
Download Articles Read Articles
Retina Arter Tıkanıklıkları ve Tedavisi...
Santral Retinal Ven Tıkanıklığı Güncel Tedavisi...
Central Retinal Artery Occlusion As the Cause of Unilateral Concentric Narrowing of Visual Field and Presence of Cilioretinal Artery...
Bilateral Optic Disc Drusen
Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor and Anti VEGF Agents...
Central Retinal Artery Occlusion As the Cause of Unilateral Concentric Narrowing of Visual Field and Presence of Cilioretinal Artery...
Retina Arter Tıkanıklıkları ve Tedavisi...
Morning Glory Syndrome Associated with Retinochoroidal Coloboma...
Santral Retinal Ven Tıkanıklığı Güncel Tedavisi...
Bilateral Optic Disc Drusen
PureSee Kesintisiz Yüksek Kalitede Görüş
Retina-Vitreous 2002 , Vol 10 , Num 2
Turkish Abstract Abstract Article PDF Similar Articles
EFFECTS OF BACKGROUND DIABETIC RETINOPATHY ON VISUAL FIELD
Nezih AYDOĞAN1, Aysel PELİT1, Özcan EVYAPAN1, Ahmet AKMAN1, Pınar AYDIN1
Başkent Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi (Adana Hastanesi) Göz A.B.D Purpose: To demonstrate how the central visual field was affected by different stimulus in patients with background diabetic retinopathy (BDR).
Methods: The central 24-2 threshold test with the strategy of fastpac on white background with both white and blue stimulus were done in 28 ( 20 women, 8 men ) patients with the diabetes mellitus without retinopathy, in 15 (10 women, 5 men ) patients with BDR and 26 ( 15 women, 11 men) individuals without any systemic disorders.
Results: The averages of mean deviation (MD), pattern standard deviation (PSD), short term fluctuation (SF), corrected pattern standard deviation (CPSD) were found as -5.6 ±3.9 dB, 3.8 ±2.2 dB, 3.1 ±1.3 dB, 2 ±2.3 dB respectively, in the normal individuals. This index values in diabetics without retinopathy were found as -4.3 ±3.8 dB, 3.6 ±1.8 dB, 2.6 ±1.1 dB, 1.9 ±1.9 dB. In diabetics with background retinopathy, those were determined as -5.9 ±4.5 dB, 4.3 ±2.5 dB, 2.9 ±1.3 dB, 2.8 ±2.7 dB. The differences among those indices were not statistically significant (p>0.05). In addition, the differences among the averages of the sums of threshold of both stimulus did not find statistically significant in four quadrants (p>0.05).
Conclusion: BDR does not affect the sensitivity of visual field results tested on white background with white and blue stimulus.
Keywords : Diabetic retinopathy, perimetry, microangiopathy
PureSee Kesintisiz Yüksek Kalitede Görüş
Home
About The Journal
Editorial Board
Instructions for Authors
Contact